Title:  Formal Analysis and Verification 

Code:  FAV 

Ac.Year:  2017/2018 

Term:  Winter 

Curriculums:  

Language:  Czech 

Public info:  http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/study/courses/FAV/public/ 

Credits:  5 

Completion:  accreditation+exam (written&verbal) 

Type of instruction:  Hour/sem  Lectures  Sem. Exercises  Lab. exercises  Comp. exercises  Other 

Hours:  39  0  0  0  13 

 Examination  Tests  Exercises  Laboratories  Other 

Points:  70  0  0  0  30 



Guarantee:  Vojnar Tomáš, prof. Ing., Ph.D., DITS 

Lecturer:  Vojnar Tomáš, prof. Ing., Ph.D., DITS 
Faculty:  Faculty of Information Technology BUT 

Department:  Department of Intelligent Systems FIT BUT 

Prerequisites:  

Schedule:  Day  Lesson  Week  Room  Start  End  Lect.Gr.  St.G.  EndG. 

Tue  exam  řádná  20180116  E104  08:00  10:50  1MIT   
Tue  exam  řádná  20180116  E104  08:00  10:50  2MIT   
Tue  lecture  lectures  A112  17:00  19:50  1MIT  16 MMM  16 MMM 
Tue  lecture  lectures  A112  17:00  19:50  2MIT  16 MMM  16 MMM 
Fri  exam  1. oprava  20180126  G202  11:00  13:50  1MIT   
Fri  exam  1. oprava  20180126  G202  11:00  13:50  2MIT   
Fri  exam  2. oprava  20180202  E112  14:00  16:50  1MIT   
Fri  exam  2. oprava  20180202  E112  14:00  16:50  2MIT   


 Learning objectives: 

  The goal of the course is to introduce formal analysis and verification to students as a modern and promising method of automated evaluation of properties of various kinds of safetycritical systems (such as drivers and other parts of operating systems, control software, workflow, communication protocols, parts of hardware, etc.). The course acquaints students both with the theoretical background of the given area, with computeraided tools based on them as well as with successful applications of formal analysis and verification in practice (Microsoft, Intel, Nasa, Airbus, ...).  Description: 

  Formal analysis and verification as a modern complement and/or alternative to validating properties of systems by means of simulation or testing. Selected formalisms for specifying properties to be checked. Model checking: formal verification based on a systematic state space exploration. Various approaches to state space reductions, especially the partial order reduction. Methods of automated abstraction of systems being examined, especially predicate abstraction. Modern methods of SAT and SMT solving and their aplications in formal analysis and verification. Static analysis based on looking for error patterns, data flow analysis, and abstract interpretation. A brief description of several advanced computeraided tools for formal analysis and verification: SMV, Spin, Slam, Blast, Java PathFinder, ARMC, FindBugs, etc. (according to the current state of the art).  Knowledge and skills required for the course: 

  Knowledge of discrete mathematics, the theory of formal languages, and algorithmics on the bachelor's level is assumed.  Subject specific learning outcomes and competences: 

  Students are acquainted with principles and methods of formal analysis and verification and with their application within the process of designing safetycritical systems. Students know capabilities and the basic ways of using computeraided tools for formal analysis and verification.  Generic learning outcomes and competences: 

  Acquired knowledge about the significance and possibilities of using formal methods within the development of various kinds of systems and about their growing use in practice.  Syllabus of lectures: 


 The meaning of the terms ``formal analysis and verification''. Capabilities and advantages of methods of formal analysis and verification. Various approaches to formal analysis and verification: model checking, static analysis, and theorem proving.
 State spaces, state space paths, abstractions of states and transitions. Interleaving and true concurrency. Linear and branching time. Safety, liveness, and fairness.
 Temporal logics CTL and CTL*, model checking systems whose properties are specified in CTL or CTL* using explicitly represented state spaces.
 Binary decision diagrams for a compact, symbolic representation of state spaces and their implementation.
 Lattices, fix points, and the KnasterTarski theorem as a formal basis for symbolic model checking.
 Symbolic model checking for CTL and CTL*.
 The temporal logic LTL, the correspondence between Büchi automata and LTL formulae, model checking systems whose properties are specified in LTL using Büchi automata.
 The partial order state space reduction. The symmetry state space reduction. An overview of other state space reduction methods. Compositional verification.
 Methods of automated abstraction of systems, the predicate abstraction, the counterexample guided abstraction refinement loop, Craig interpolation.
 Decision procedures and modern methods of SAT and SMT solving and their use in formal verification (e.g., in the predicate abstraction).
 Classical dataflow analyses (such as live variables, available expressions, etc.) as well as some selected, more advanced dataflow analyses (like some pointer analyses), their description via flow equations, and iterative methods of solving these methods.
 Abstract interpretation and its use for defining static analyses.
 Static analyses based on searching for bug patterns, a note on selected dynamic analyses, esp. those for detecting concurrencyrelated errors.
 Syllabus  others, projects and individual work of students: 


 A project including an installation of a selected tool for automated verification on a formal basis (Spin, Blast, ARMC, SMV, JPF, FindBugs, Invader, Uppaal aj.), experiments with this tool, and a preparation of an essay describing principles on which the chosen tool is built (10 pts.) and the performed experiments (10 pts. for experiments with existing case studies, 10 pts. for new case studies). It is possible to agree on studying a tool based on principles that are not a part of the lectures (theorem proving, realtime systems, etc.).
 Fundamental literature: 


 Baier, C., Katoen, J.P.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, 2008.
 Nielson, F., Nielson, H.R., Hankin, C.: Principles of Program Analysis, SpringerVerlag, 2005.
 Edmund, M.C., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, 2000.
 Khedker, U., Sanyal, A., Sathe, B.: Data Flow Analysis: Theory and Practice, CRC Press, 2009.
 Study literature: 


 Baier, C., Katoen, J.P.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, 2008.
 Nielson, F., Nielson, H.R., Hankin, C.: Principles of Program Analysis, SpringerVerlag, 2005.
 Edmund, M.C., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. MIT Press, 2000.
 Aho, A.V., Lam, S., Sethi, R., Ullman, J.D.: Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Addison Wesley, 2nd ed., 2006. The part devoted to static analysis.
 Bradley, A.R., Manna, Z.: The Calculus of Computation: Decision Procedures with Applications to Verification, Springer, 2007.
 Valmari, A.: The State Explosion Problem. In Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G.: Lectures on Petri Nets I: Basic Models, volume 1491 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 429528. SpringerVerlag, 1998.
 Chess, B., West,J.: Secure Programming with Static Analysis. AddisonWesley Professional, 2007.
 Khedker, U., Sanyal, A., Sathe, B.: Data Flow Analysis: Theory and Practice, CRC Press, 2009.
 Kroening, D., Strichman, O.: Decision Procedures: An Algorithmic Point of View, Springer, 2008.
 Holzmann, G.J.: The SPIN Model Checker: Primer and Reference Manual, AddisonWesley Professional, 2003.
 BenAri, M.: Principles of the Spin Model Checker, Springer, 2008.
 Bertot Y., Castéran, P.: Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development: Coq'Art: The Calculus of Inductive Constructions, Springer, 2010.
 Materials presented within the lectures and made accessible via the Internet.
 Materials freely accessible on the Internet, especially papers and documentation related to the various computeraided tools for formal analysis and verification.
 Progress assessment: 

   An evaluated project for 30 points.
 A final examination for 70 points.
 To be allowed to sit for the written examination, a student is to earn at least 15 points during the semester.
 Exam prerequisites: 

  Having at least 50% of the possible point evaluation of the project.  
