Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
talks:seminar [2019/11/22 07:50] krivkatalks:seminar [2022/12/01 23:38] (current) krivka
Line 6: Line 6:
 ===== Program semináře ===== ===== Program semináře =====
  
 +==== 2022 ====
 +  * **5. - 15. 12. 2022: [[http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~meduna/work/doku.php?id=lectures:lta:lta22|LANGUAGE THEORY with APPLICATIONS 2022]] (LTA 2022) - studentský workshop**
 +    * Podrobný program - [[http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~meduna/work/doku.php?id=lectures:lta:lta22#conference_schedule|zde]] (přednášky vedeny v angličtině)
 +    * **5. 12. 2022, 11:00 - 13:20, A112, FIT VUT v Brně**
 +      * **[[itomko@fit.vut.cz|Ing. Martin Tomko]]: Multi-Island Finite Automata and Their Even Computation**
 +      * **[[kocman@fit.vut.cz|Ing. Radim Kocman, PhD.]]: Advanced LL parsing techniques**
 +        * Abstrakty a detaily rozvrhu přednášek dostupné na stránce [[:lectures:lta:lta22|LTA 2022]].
 +
 +
 +==== 2020 ====
 +  * **10. - 15. 12. 2020: [[http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~meduna/work/doku.php?id=lectures:lta:lta20|LANGUAGE THEORY with APPLICATIONS 2020]] (LTA 2020) - studentský workshop (on-line)**
 +    * Podrobný program - [[http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~meduna/work/doku.php?id=lectures:lta:lta20#conference_schedule|zde]] (přednášky vedeny v angličtině)
 +    * **10. 12. 2020, 12:00 - 13:30, [[https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZjEzZmE4MjgtZDExNi00NjUxLWIxMGMtMzlkODcwNTY0NTIw%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22c63ce729-ca17-4e52-aa2d-96b79489a542%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22b0c92057-f3f8-43f5-995e-a5cec0b35bfe%22%7d|On-line přes MS Teams]], FIT VUT v Brně**
 +      * **[[pmartinek@utb.cz|dr. Pavel Martinek]]: Multiset Languages and Minimization Problem for Multiset Finite Automata**
 +        * **Abstract**:
 +          * //Multisets// (also called //bags//) represent such a generalization of sets which allow multiplied occurrence of their elements. Finite automata working over multisets differ from usual finite automata in the way how they process their input. Namely, at each computational step, they read a symbol from their input multiset regardless of any ordering of the input. Thus, instead of processing strings of symbols the automata process multisets of symbols. This formalism was already used in defining computational models inspired from biochemistry (like the chemical abstract machine by Berry and Boudol, 1992) or biology (cf. well-known P systems). It has also strong connections to jumping automata introduced by Meduna and Zemek in 2012.
 +          * The aim of the talk is to describe the concept of multiset automata and their place in formal languages theory, to show their similarities and dissimilarities with classical and jumping finite automata and to deal with minimization of these automata.
  
 ==== 2019 ==== ==== 2019 ====
Line 16: Line 33:
           * It is well known that the set of context-free languages is a strict subset  of  the  set  of  recursively  enumerable  languages.   Analogously,  a  type-2 (or context-free) grammar cannot simulate a type-0 grammars.  However, if we control or regulate the application of the context-free rules, then we can make the grammar to simulate a type-0 grammar.  Several regulations are associated with these grammars and are called regulated rewriting grammars. Some of them are (i) Matrix rewriting grammars (ii) Graph-Controlled grammars (iii) Semi-Conditional  grammars. The descriptional complexity  investigates  the  economical measures required for a grammatical device, automaton, or a rewriting system for a succinct representation of a formal language class.           * It is well known that the set of context-free languages is a strict subset  of  the  set  of  recursively  enumerable  languages.   Analogously,  a  type-2 (or context-free) grammar cannot simulate a type-0 grammars.  However, if we control or regulate the application of the context-free rules, then we can make the grammar to simulate a type-0 grammar.  Several regulations are associated with these grammars and are called regulated rewriting grammars. Some of them are (i) Matrix rewriting grammars (ii) Graph-Controlled grammars (iii) Semi-Conditional  grammars. The descriptional complexity  investigates  the  economical measures required for a grammatical device, automaton, or a rewriting system for a succinct representation of a formal language class.
           * In this talk, we are going to concentrate on semi-conditional grammars and their variants simple semi-conditional and generalized forbidden grammars.  In a semi-conditional grammar, the derivations are controlled by permitting string and/or  forbidden  string  that  are  associated  with  each  rule  and  is  known  as conditional rule.   The  maximum  lengths  of  permitting  strings  of  permitting and  forbidden  strings  refer  to  the degree of  the  system.   Besides  degree,  the number of nonterminals and the number of conditional rules are considered to be descriptional complexity measures.  We will see the computational completeness results of the above said systems with minimal/succinct sizes of measures.  Our proofs include some novel ideas and effective use of Geffert normal forms.  In the sequel, we will review some results available in the literature; many of the results are contributed by Prof.  Alexander Meduna and his research group.            * In this talk, we are going to concentrate on semi-conditional grammars and their variants simple semi-conditional and generalized forbidden grammars.  In a semi-conditional grammar, the derivations are controlled by permitting string and/or  forbidden  string  that  are  associated  with  each  rule  and  is  known  as conditional rule.   The  maximum  lengths  of  permitting  strings  of  permitting and  forbidden  strings  refer  to  the degree of  the  system.   Besides  degree,  the number of nonterminals and the number of conditional rules are considered to be descriptional complexity measures.  We will see the computational completeness results of the above said systems with minimal/succinct sizes of measures.  Our proofs include some novel ideas and effective use of Geffert normal forms.  In the sequel, we will review some results available in the literature; many of the results are contributed by Prof.  Alexander Meduna and his research group. 
-    * **ZMĚNA** :!: :!: :!: **2. 12. 2019, 11:00 - 12:30, [[http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/FIT/map/fit1.php?show=A112|přednášková místnost A112]], FIT VUT, Božetěchova 2, Brno**+    * **2. 12. 2019, 11:00 - 12:30, [[http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/FIT/map/fit1.php?show=A112|přednášková místnost A112]], FIT VUT, Božetěchova 2, Brno**
       * **[[lakshma@vit.ac.in|Lakshmanan Kuppusamy]]: Descriptional Complexity of Matrix and Graph-Controlled Insertion-Deletion Systems**       * **[[lakshma@vit.ac.in|Lakshmanan Kuppusamy]]: Descriptional Complexity of Matrix and Graph-Controlled Insertion-Deletion Systems**
         * **Abstract**:         * **Abstract**:
talks/seminar.1574405451.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/11/22 07:50 by krivka
 
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
Recent changes RSS feed Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki